fix: add @MainActor to MessageDeduplicationService for thread safety

Added @MainActor annotation to both LRUDeduplicationCache and
MessageDeduplicationService classes. This provides compile-time
enforcement of thread safety since all callers (ChatViewModel,
NostrRelayManager) are already on MainActor.

Benefits:
- Compile-time enforcement prevents future misuse
- Simpler than internal locking mechanisms
- Consistent with existing patterns in codebase

Also adds:
- @MainActor annotation to existing test suites
- 5 new concurrency tests verifying thread safety behavior

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

bitchat/Services/MessageDeduplicationService.swift

@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ import Foundation
 
 /// Generic LRU (Least Recently Used) cache for deduplication.
 /// Uses an efficient O(1) lookup with periodic compaction.
+/// Thread-safe via @MainActor - all callers are already on main actor.
+@MainActor
 final class LRUDeduplicationCache<Value> {
     private var map: [String: Value] = [:]
     private var order: [String] = []
@@ -157,6 +159,8 @@ enum ContentNormalizer {
 
 /// Service that manages message deduplication using LRU caches.
 /// Provides separate caches for content-based dedup and Nostr event ID dedup.
+/// Thread-safe via @MainActor - all callers are already on main actor.
+@MainActor
 final class MessageDeduplicationService {
 
     /// Cache for content-based near-duplicate detection

bitchatTests/MessageDeduplicationServiceTests.swift

@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ import Foundation
 
 // MARK: - LRU Deduplication Cache Tests
 
+@Suite("LRU Deduplication Cache")
+@MainActor
 struct LRUDeduplicationCacheTests {
 
     // MARK: - Basic Operations
@@ -265,6 +267,8 @@ struct ContentNormalizerTests {
 
 // MARK: - Message Deduplication Service Tests
 
+@Suite("Message Deduplication Service")
+@MainActor
 struct MessageDeduplicationServiceTests {
 
     // MARK: - Content Deduplication
@@ -467,4 +471,134 @@ struct MessageDeduplicationServiceTests {
         #expect(service.contentTimestamp(for: "hello world") == now)
         #expect(service.contentTimestamp(for: "Hello World") == now)
     }
+
+    // MARK: - Thread Safety Tests (via @MainActor enforcement)
+
+    @Test("Concurrent content recording is safe via MainActor")
+    func concurrentContentRecording() async {
+        let service = MessageDeduplicationService(contentCapacity: 1000, nostrEventCapacity: 1000)
+        let iterations = 100
+
+        // All operations run on MainActor due to @MainActor annotation
+        // This test verifies the pattern works correctly
+        await withTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    service.recordContent("Message \(i)", timestamp: Date())
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Verify some entries were recorded
+        #expect(service.contentTimestamp(for: "Message 0") != nil)
+        #expect(service.contentTimestamp(for: "Message 99") != nil)
+    }
+
+    @Test("Concurrent Nostr event recording is safe via MainActor")
+    func concurrentNostrEventRecording() async {
+        let service = MessageDeduplicationService(contentCapacity: 1000, nostrEventCapacity: 1000)
+        let iterations = 100
+
+        await withTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    service.recordNostrEvent("event_\(i)")
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Verify events were recorded
+        #expect(service.hasProcessedNostrEvent("event_0"))
+        #expect(service.hasProcessedNostrEvent("event_99"))
+    }
+
+    @Test("Mixed concurrent operations are safe via MainActor")
+    func concurrentMixedOperations() async {
+        let service = MessageDeduplicationService(contentCapacity: 1000, nostrEventCapacity: 1000)
+        let iterations = 50
+
+        await withTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
+            // Content recording tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    service.recordContent("Content \(i)", timestamp: Date())
+                }
+            }
+
+            // Event recording tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    service.recordNostrEvent("event_\(i)")
+                }
+            }
+
+            // ACK recording tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    service.recordNostrAck("ack_\(i)")
+                }
+            }
+
+            // Read tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    _ = service.contentTimestamp(for: "Content \(i)")
+                    _ = service.hasProcessedNostrEvent("event_\(i)")
+                    _ = service.hasProcessedNostrAck("ack_\(i)")
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // If we reach here without crashes, the test passes
+    }
+}
+
+// MARK: - LRU Cache Thread Safety Tests
+
+@Suite("LRU Cache Thread Safety")
+@MainActor
+struct LRUCacheThreadSafetyTests {
+
+    @Test("Concurrent cache access is safe via MainActor")
+    func concurrentCacheAccess() async {
+        let cache = LRUDeduplicationCache<Int>(capacity: 500)
+        let iterations = 100
+
+        await withTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
+            // Write tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    cache.record("key_\(i)", value: i)
+                }
+            }
+
+            // Read tasks
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    _ = cache.contains("key_\(i)")
+                    _ = cache.value(for: "key_\(i)")
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Verify cache is in consistent state
+        #expect(cache.count <= 500) // Respects capacity
+    }
+
+    @Test("Cache eviction under concurrent load is safe")
+    func cacheEvictionUnderLoad() async {
+        let cache = LRUDeduplicationCache<Int>(capacity: 10)
+        let iterations = 100
+
+        await withTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
+            for i in 0..<iterations {
+                group.addTask { @MainActor in
+                    cache.record("key_\(i)", value: i)
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Cache should maintain its capacity constraint
+        #expect(cache.count == 10)
+    }
 }