mirror of
https://github.com/permissionlesstech/bitchat.git
synced 2026-07-27 12:45:20 +00:00
Raising four deadlines fixed the four tests that happened to fire. The class was still there: fourteen separate waitUntil helpers, most defaulting to 1.0s, plus wait call sites with literal budgets. The fifth instance would have landed the same way, on someone else's unrelated PR. The rule, now written down in TestConstants.settleTimeout: **a wait deadline is not a latency budget.** It exists so a genuine hang eventually fails the suite, so size it for the worst-case scheduler, never for how long the operation should take. Waits return as soon as their condition holds, so a generous deadline is free in the passing case and only extends genuine failures. - Every wait helper now defaults to TestConstants.settleTimeout (30s), and the literal wait call sites below the floor were converted too — sixteen sites across ten files. - TestTimingHygieneTests enforces it by scanning the test sources: wait defaults and wait call sites must be at least minimumSettleTimeout, and no test may assert an upper bound on elapsed wall-clock time (the assertion that started this, which cannot separate correct behaviour from a slow machine). - Both rules waive per line with "test-timing-ok: <reason>", accepted on the line or in the comment block above it so the reason has room to be a sentence. One legitimate use so far: a NEGATIVE wait in NoiseCoverageTests asserting a promotion has *not* completed within 50ms, where a long deadline would only make the suite slow while still passing. Injected production timeouts are deliberately not matched — the Noise handshake timeouts are the behaviour under test, and short values are correct there. Verified the guard actually fails: a canary file with both banned shapes was flagged with file and line, and the suite went green again once it was removed. Full suite passes with all 18 cores saturated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
336 lines
14 KiB
Swift
336 lines
14 KiB
Swift
import Foundation
|
|
import Testing
|
|
|
|
@testable import bitchat
|
|
|
|
/// Vouch storage, accept-policy gates, derived trust levels, and persistence
|
|
/// compatibility for `SecureIdentityStateManager`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Ordering note: mutations use barrier blocks on the manager's concurrent
|
|
/// queue and reads use `queue.sync`, so a read submitted after a mutation
|
|
/// always observes it — no polling needed.
|
|
///
|
|
/// `@MainActor` matches production (the manager's vouch API is driven by the
|
|
/// main-actor `ChatVouchCoordinator`) and keeps the blocking `queue.sync`
|
|
/// reads off the Swift Concurrency cooperative pool. Left nonisolated, Swift
|
|
/// Testing runs these tests in parallel on that pool, and on CI's few-core
|
|
/// runners every pool thread ended up parked in `queue.sync` behind a pending
|
|
/// `queue.async(.barrier)` write that never got a dispatch worker — a
|
|
/// process-wide deadlock (watchdog SIGKILL, exit 137).
|
|
@MainActor
|
|
struct SecureIdentityStateManagerVouchTests {
|
|
private let voucher = String(repeating: "0a", count: 32)
|
|
private let vouchee = String(repeating: "0b", count: 32)
|
|
|
|
private func makeManager() -> SecureIdentityStateManager {
|
|
SecureIdentityStateManager(MockKeychain())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Accept-policy gates
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func recordVouch_rejectsUnverifiedVoucher() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date()))
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).isEmpty)
|
|
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
#expect(manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date()))
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).count == 1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func recordVouch_ignoresSelfVouch() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: voucher, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date()))
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: voucher).isEmpty)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func recordVouch_ignoresAlreadyVerifiedVouchee() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: vouchee, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date()))
|
|
#expect(!manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func recordVouch_rejectsStaleAndFarFutureTimestamps() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
let stale = Date().addingTimeInterval(-31 * 24 * 60 * 60)
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: stale))
|
|
|
|
let farFuture = Date().addingTimeInterval(2 * 60 * 60)
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: farFuture))
|
|
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).isEmpty)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func recordVouch_capsVouchersPerVoucheeKeepingMostRecent() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
let base = Date()
|
|
|
|
// 9 verified vouchers vouch with strictly increasing timestamps.
|
|
let vouchers = (0..<9).map { String(format: "%02x", $0 + 0x10) + String(repeating: "00", count: 31) }
|
|
for (index, voucherFingerprint) in vouchers.enumerated() {
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucherFingerprint, verified: true)
|
|
let stored = manager.recordVouch(
|
|
voucheeFingerprint: vouchee,
|
|
voucherFingerprint: voucherFingerprint,
|
|
timestamp: base.addingTimeInterval(TimeInterval(index)),
|
|
now: base.addingTimeInterval(TimeInterval(index))
|
|
)
|
|
#expect(stored)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let records = manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee)
|
|
#expect(records.count == SecureIdentityStateManager.maxVouchersPerVouchee)
|
|
// The oldest voucher fell off the end.
|
|
#expect(!records.contains { $0.voucherFingerprint == vouchers[0] })
|
|
#expect(records.contains { $0.voucherFingerprint == vouchers[8] })
|
|
|
|
// An attestation older than everything retained is not stored.
|
|
let older = String(repeating: "0c", count: 32)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: older, verified: true)
|
|
#expect(!manager.recordVouch(
|
|
voucheeFingerprint: vouchee,
|
|
voucherFingerprint: older,
|
|
timestamp: base.addingTimeInterval(-1),
|
|
now: base
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
// A repeat vouch from a retained voucher refreshes, not duplicates.
|
|
#expect(manager.recordVouch(
|
|
voucheeFingerprint: vouchee,
|
|
voucherFingerprint: vouchers[8],
|
|
timestamp: base.addingTimeInterval(100),
|
|
now: base.addingTimeInterval(100)
|
|
))
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).count == SecureIdentityStateManager.maxVouchersPerVouchee)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Derived trust & invalidation
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func unverifyingVoucher_invalidatesTheirVouchesWithoutDeletingThem() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date())
|
|
#expect(manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
|
|
// Removing my verification of the voucher retires their vouches…
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: false)
|
|
#expect(!manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).isEmpty)
|
|
|
|
// …but the records survive: re-verifying the voucher restores them
|
|
// (recompute on read, no cascade delete).
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
#expect(manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func validVouchers_expireAtReadTime() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
let now = Date()
|
|
let timestamp = now.addingTimeInterval(-29 * 24 * 60 * 60)
|
|
#expect(manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: timestamp, now: now))
|
|
#expect(manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee, now: now))
|
|
|
|
let twoDaysLater = now.addingTimeInterval(2 * 24 * 60 * 60)
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee, now: twoDaysLater).isEmpty)
|
|
#expect(!manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee, now: twoDaysLater))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func effectiveTrustLevel_slotsVouchedBetweenCasualAndTrusted() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
// Unknown peer with a valid vouch reads as vouched.
|
|
#expect(manager.effectiveTrustLevel(for: vouchee) == .unknown)
|
|
manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date())
|
|
#expect(manager.effectiveTrustLevel(for: vouchee) == .vouched)
|
|
|
|
// Explicit trust outranks a vouch.
|
|
manager.updateSocialIdentity(SocialIdentity(
|
|
fingerprint: vouchee,
|
|
localPetname: nil,
|
|
claimedNickname: "bob",
|
|
trustLevel: .trusted,
|
|
isFavorite: false,
|
|
isBlocked: false,
|
|
notes: nil
|
|
))
|
|
#expect(manager.effectiveTrustLevel(for: vouchee) == .trusted)
|
|
|
|
// Explicit verification outranks everything.
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: vouchee, verified: true)
|
|
#expect(manager.effectiveTrustLevel(for: vouchee) == .verified)
|
|
#expect(!manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
|
|
// Losing the voucher downgrades vouched back to the stored level.
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: vouchee, verified: false)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: false)
|
|
#expect(manager.effectiveTrustLevel(for: vouchee) == .casual)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Exchange-policy state
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func mostRecentlyVerifiedFingerprints_ordersAndExcludes() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
let first = String(repeating: "01", count: 32)
|
|
let second = String(repeating: "02", count: 32)
|
|
let third = String(repeating: "03", count: 32)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: first, verified: true)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: second, verified: true)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: third, verified: true)
|
|
|
|
let ordered = manager.mostRecentlyVerifiedFingerprints(limit: 16, excluding: third)
|
|
#expect(ordered == [second, first])
|
|
|
|
let limited = manager.mostRecentlyVerifiedFingerprints(limit: 1, excluding: third)
|
|
#expect(limited == [second])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func vouchBatchSentAt_roundTrips() {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
#expect(manager.lastVouchBatchSent(to: voucher) == nil)
|
|
|
|
let sentAt = Date(timeIntervalSince1970: 1_700_000_000)
|
|
manager.markVouchBatchSent(to: voucher, at: sentAt)
|
|
#expect(manager.lastVouchBatchSent(to: voucher) == sentAt)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func signingPublicKey_returnsAnnounceBoundKeyByFingerprint() async {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
let signingKey = Data(repeating: 0x22, count: 32)
|
|
manager.upsertCryptographicIdentity(
|
|
fingerprint: voucher,
|
|
noisePublicKey: Data(repeating: 0x11, count: 32),
|
|
signingPublicKey: signingKey,
|
|
claimedNickname: nil
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let stored = await waitUntil { manager.signingPublicKey(forFingerprint: voucher) == signingKey }
|
|
#expect(stored)
|
|
#expect(manager.signingPublicKey(forFingerprint: vouchee) == nil)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Panic wipe
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func clearAllIdentityData_wipesVouchState() async {
|
|
let manager = makeManager()
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date())
|
|
manager.markVouchBatchSent(to: voucher, at: Date())
|
|
#expect(manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
|
|
manager.clearAllIdentityData()
|
|
|
|
let wiped = await waitUntil { !manager.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee) }
|
|
#expect(wiped)
|
|
#expect(manager.validVouchers(for: vouchee).isEmpty)
|
|
#expect(manager.lastVouchBatchSent(to: voucher) == nil)
|
|
#expect(manager.mostRecentlyVerifiedFingerprints(limit: 16, excluding: "").isEmpty)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Persistence compatibility
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func trustLevelRawValuesAreStable() throws {
|
|
// Raw values are what's persisted; they must never change when cases
|
|
// are added mid-ladder.
|
|
#expect(TrustLevel.unknown.rawValue == "unknown")
|
|
#expect(TrustLevel.casual.rawValue == "casual")
|
|
#expect(TrustLevel.vouched.rawValue == "vouched")
|
|
#expect(TrustLevel.trusted.rawValue == "trusted")
|
|
#expect(TrustLevel.verified.rawValue == "verified")
|
|
|
|
let legacy = Data(#"["unknown","casual","trusted","verified"]"#.utf8)
|
|
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode([TrustLevel].self, from: legacy)
|
|
#expect(decoded == [.unknown, .casual, .trusted, .verified])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func identityCachePersistedBeforeVouchingDecodesCleanly() throws {
|
|
// A cache captured before the vouch fields existed must decode without
|
|
// tripping the "unreadable cache" recovery path.
|
|
let legacyJSON = Data("""
|
|
{
|
|
"socialIdentities": {},
|
|
"nicknameIndex": {},
|
|
"verifiedFingerprints": ["\(voucher)"],
|
|
"lastInteractions": {},
|
|
"blockedNostrPubkeys": [],
|
|
"version": 1
|
|
}
|
|
""".utf8)
|
|
|
|
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(IdentityCache.self, from: legacyJSON)
|
|
#expect(decoded.vouchesByVouchee == nil)
|
|
#expect(decoded.vouchBatchSentAt == nil)
|
|
#expect(decoded.verifiedAt == nil)
|
|
#expect(decoded.verifiedFingerprints == [voucher])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func identityCacheRoundTripsVouchState() throws {
|
|
var cache = IdentityCache()
|
|
cache.verifiedFingerprints = [voucher]
|
|
cache.vouchesByVouchee = [vouchee: [VouchRecord(voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date(timeIntervalSince1970: 1_700_000_000))]]
|
|
cache.vouchBatchSentAt = [voucher: Date(timeIntervalSince1970: 1_700_000_001)]
|
|
cache.verifiedAt = [voucher: Date(timeIntervalSince1970: 1_700_000_002)]
|
|
|
|
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(IdentityCache.self, from: JSONEncoder().encode(cache))
|
|
#expect(decoded.vouchesByVouchee == cache.vouchesByVouchee)
|
|
#expect(decoded.vouchBatchSentAt == cache.vouchBatchSentAt)
|
|
#expect(decoded.verifiedAt == cache.verifiedAt)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
func vouchStateSurvivesReload() async {
|
|
let keychain = MockKeychain()
|
|
let manager = SecureIdentityStateManager(keychain)
|
|
manager.setVerified(fingerprint: voucher, verified: true)
|
|
manager.recordVouch(voucheeFingerprint: vouchee, voucherFingerprint: voucher, timestamp: Date())
|
|
let saved = await waitUntil { manager.isVouched(fingerprint: self.vouchee) }
|
|
#expect(saved)
|
|
manager.forceSave()
|
|
|
|
let reloaded = SecureIdentityStateManager(keychain)
|
|
#expect(reloaded.isVouched(fingerprint: vouchee))
|
|
#expect(reloaded.validVouchers(for: vouchee).count == 1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MARK: - Helpers
|
|
|
|
private func waitUntil(
|
|
timeout: TimeInterval = TestConstants.settleTimeout,
|
|
condition: @escaping () -> Bool
|
|
) async -> Bool {
|
|
let deadline = Date().addingTimeInterval(timeout)
|
|
while Date() < deadline {
|
|
if condition() {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
try? await Task.sleep(nanoseconds: 10_000_000)
|
|
}
|
|
return condition()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|